Improve modulo comment
Technically, the % operator in JS is _not_ the modulo operator. It's a different operator that returns negative values by design. So it _does_ work with negative numbers as intended, it's just not the operator that is needed for the caesar shift. Therefore, mod does not "make % work with negative numbers", it just uses % to implement the modulo operator. The previous comment might suggest that there is a bug that gets fixed, the new comment hopefully avoids that source of possible confusion.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d27422bc5
commit
a539c1776a
|
@ -7,8 +7,9 @@ const caesar = function(string, shiftValue) {
|
|||
|
||||
const codeSet = code => (code < 97 ? 65 : 97);
|
||||
|
||||
// this function is just a fancy way of doing % so that it works with negative numbers
|
||||
// see this link for details:
|
||||
// This function implements a version of the modulo operator
|
||||
// that returns the smallest positive remainder even for negative inputs.
|
||||
// See this link for details:
|
||||
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4467539/javascript-modulo-gives-a-negative-result-for-negative-numbers
|
||||
const mod = (n, m) => (n % m + m) % m;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue